`Time ladies & gentlemen please`
Some twenty years back I was introduced to what must surely be the mother of all out of place artifacts.
Some twenty years back I was introduced to what must surely be the mother of all out of place artifacts.
`The Prince Sabu Tri-Lobed Disc`
Briefly, for those not already aquainted....found in the Saqqara region of Egypt in the 1930's, catalogued at the Cairo Museum as a 1st Dynasty ceremonial bowl/chalice.
Deemed to be at least 5,000yrs old it predates the invention of the wheel by some 1,400yrs..at least.
It was immediately clear, as it would be to any reasoned person without prejudice, that this WAS a wheel & a highly evolved one at that!
Highly evolved suggested some equally evolved purpose....& I resolved to find out that purpose.
And thus I've spent an inordinate number of hours over those 20yrs doing little else other than the little else available to me...to stare at the Prince Sabu disc & wonder. I have meditated on it, communed with it at the deepest of levels, driven myself mentally over/through many a hurdle/hoop in my attempts to define this complete unknown.
Now...a figment of my imagination it may well be but what follows is not rocket science. It is, perhaps quite literally, Divine in its simplicity...nothing contained within indulges in off the wall pseudo sciences. At no point are you asked to accept anything...All is in plain sight for you to see for youself.
However...I must beg you to appreciate that if it's taken me 20yrs to see this something in plain sight then you are not going to see it by simply browsing over this attempt to bring it to your attention.
If it succeeds in grabbing that attention then that attention will then need to be applied, big time!
For two decades I have attempted to prove to myself that this IS, by all good common-sense, surely a nonsense...however the more I've tried so the more it has insisted on proving itself perhaps otherwise.
Now...if that should actually be the case here then this apparent absurdity would be pure Enlightenment...with a capital E.
And Enlightenment isn't communicated by electronic mail, or indeed any other medium, it's found by the person seeking it, at a cost that's never cheap....to this I can most certainly testify!
Here I take you down my path, pointing out the scenery & what I've imagined it to be...but you are going to have to seek...stretch your own minds to imagine what I'm imagining...only then will you be able to actually see this for yourself & thus be in a position to varify the following...
-------------------
Refering to the following images A/B
Briefly, for those not already aquainted....found in the Saqqara region of Egypt in the 1930's, catalogued at the Cairo Museum as a 1st Dynasty ceremonial bowl/chalice.
Deemed to be at least 5,000yrs old it predates the invention of the wheel by some 1,400yrs..at least.
It was immediately clear, as it would be to any reasoned person without prejudice, that this WAS a wheel & a highly evolved one at that!
Highly evolved suggested some equally evolved purpose....& I resolved to find out that purpose.
And thus I've spent an inordinate number of hours over those 20yrs doing little else other than the little else available to me...to stare at the Prince Sabu disc & wonder. I have meditated on it, communed with it at the deepest of levels, driven myself mentally over/through many a hurdle/hoop in my attempts to define this complete unknown.
Now...a figment of my imagination it may well be but what follows is not rocket science. It is, perhaps quite literally, Divine in its simplicity...nothing contained within indulges in off the wall pseudo sciences. At no point are you asked to accept anything...All is in plain sight for you to see for youself.
However...I must beg you to appreciate that if it's taken me 20yrs to see this something in plain sight then you are not going to see it by simply browsing over this attempt to bring it to your attention.
If it succeeds in grabbing that attention then that attention will then need to be applied, big time!
For two decades I have attempted to prove to myself that this IS, by all good common-sense, surely a nonsense...however the more I've tried so the more it has insisted on proving itself perhaps otherwise.
Now...if that should actually be the case here then this apparent absurdity would be pure Enlightenment...with a capital E.
And Enlightenment isn't communicated by electronic mail, or indeed any other medium, it's found by the person seeking it, at a cost that's never cheap....to this I can most certainly testify!
Here I take you down my path, pointing out the scenery & what I've imagined it to be...but you are going to have to seek...stretch your own minds to imagine what I'm imagining...only then will you be able to actually see this for yourself & thus be in a position to varify the following...
-------------------
Refering to the following images A/B
A: A Sabu disc with four spheres, bunched into a tetrahedral, placed upon it.
The spheres are each equal in diameter to the disc.
You can view this as three spheres to the fore, one sphere behind or visa-versa
Straight away we have ourselves a fine example of the mental effort required of you...whereby I can confidently declare that the three spheres are engaged in the disc in the least engageable manner possible & with the least contact possible.
With a fair degree of effort you might confirm that the spheres do indeed `sit nicely`...perhaps/kinda..?
A much more extreme effort is required, unfortunately, to confirm that this state of affairs cannot be bettered by design...it is already perfection personified should contact/friction be the consideration..
B: The Sabu disc can be seen as a plug...it's the plug that sits perfectly within that complex three-dimensional shape that dips into the centre of any three spheres grouped together.
I must apologise for my graphics here...I can barely manage to create these...any 3D perspective is way beyond me sadly.
But hopefully B will aid your consideration of A none the less.
Ok, we've hopefully assertained that this disc will `key` into the centre of three grouped spheres & maintain a bare minimum hold of those spheres with bare minimum contact....& also an obvious, that a single sphere will sit centrally on a disc, resting on its three petals, least possible contact...si?
That the Sabu disc is a wee cage that simply `plops` oh so sweetly into three bunched balls & that a tetrahedral of four spheres therefore can be sandwiched between two such discs facing each other?
Let's for now accept `perhaps, kinda` as an assertion & move on.
The Sabu disc might indeed be a chalice as catalogued...but not as imagined.
If my nonsense should prove correct then it would have to be the Holy Chalice no less...a Divine piece of three dimensional Sacred Geometry that holds/contains & gives rise to none other than the Holy Grail itself!
The Grail itself is a motion...The Motion of the four sphered tetra held between two of these discs.
So...let's look closely at a regular tetra, see it for what it really is & set it into this `Mother of all Motions`...
-----------------
We know of course that all tetra have six edges, four faces & four vertices.
In this four sphered tetrahedral then...any one sphere is a vertice, any two an edge & any three a face.
We know also, that a tetra has seven axes...
Four run between the centre of any face (three spheres) & its opposite vertice (one sphere)...these four axes are the Median axes.
Three run between the centre of any edge (two spheres) & its opposite edge. These three axes are the bimedian axes, each set in one of the three dimensions.
And it is to these three bimedian axes that I now turn.
The spheres are each equal in diameter to the disc.
You can view this as three spheres to the fore, one sphere behind or visa-versa
Straight away we have ourselves a fine example of the mental effort required of you...whereby I can confidently declare that the three spheres are engaged in the disc in the least engageable manner possible & with the least contact possible.
With a fair degree of effort you might confirm that the spheres do indeed `sit nicely`...perhaps/kinda..?
A much more extreme effort is required, unfortunately, to confirm that this state of affairs cannot be bettered by design...it is already perfection personified should contact/friction be the consideration..
B: The Sabu disc can be seen as a plug...it's the plug that sits perfectly within that complex three-dimensional shape that dips into the centre of any three spheres grouped together.
I must apologise for my graphics here...I can barely manage to create these...any 3D perspective is way beyond me sadly.
But hopefully B will aid your consideration of A none the less.
Ok, we've hopefully assertained that this disc will `key` into the centre of three grouped spheres & maintain a bare minimum hold of those spheres with bare minimum contact....& also an obvious, that a single sphere will sit centrally on a disc, resting on its three petals, least possible contact...si?
That the Sabu disc is a wee cage that simply `plops` oh so sweetly into three bunched balls & that a tetrahedral of four spheres therefore can be sandwiched between two such discs facing each other?
Let's for now accept `perhaps, kinda` as an assertion & move on.
The Sabu disc might indeed be a chalice as catalogued...but not as imagined.
If my nonsense should prove correct then it would have to be the Holy Chalice no less...a Divine piece of three dimensional Sacred Geometry that holds/contains & gives rise to none other than the Holy Grail itself!
The Grail itself is a motion...The Motion of the four sphered tetra held between two of these discs.
So...let's look closely at a regular tetra, see it for what it really is & set it into this `Mother of all Motions`...
-----------------
We know of course that all tetra have six edges, four faces & four vertices.
In this four sphered tetrahedral then...any one sphere is a vertice, any two an edge & any three a face.
We know also, that a tetra has seven axes...
Four run between the centre of any face (three spheres) & its opposite vertice (one sphere)...these four axes are the Median axes.
Three run between the centre of any edge (two spheres) & its opposite edge. These three axes are the bimedian axes, each set in one of the three dimensions.
And it is to these three bimedian axes that I now turn.
Here is a tetra split into two colours. We view it along one of its three bimedian axes....through the centre of one vertical edge (red/blue) & its horizontal opposite 2nd edge (blue/red).
It is apparent that the all red edge (3) & it's opposite all blue edge (4) are the two strands of a double helix, spiralling along/around our axis, towards & away from us the viewer.
Furthermore...there is a second double helix doing likewise along/around this same axis but in reverse to the first.
This is edges 5/6....red front/blue rear & blue front/red rear.
Further again...a tetra has 3D symetry via its three bimedian axes.
So what exists here on this bimedian, in this dimension, also exists on the other two bimedians/dimensions...simply demonstrated by changing the red/blue pairing above to either of the other two pairing options available.
This is already well established in Geometry but it's perhaps not fully appreciated...
That two stranded double helixes, joined & extending out from a `point` into the three dimensions form a tetra of six strands at that point?
Now, perhaps my confessed ignorance of Physics is paying way too much notice of itself...but as I understand it then it IS well understood & accepted that this entire Realm is but Energy & nothing else?
And that it's also accepted, though as yet NOT understood, that this Energy is Electromagnetic...& nothing else?
In addition I'm fully convinced that we are all able to agree that this Realm is three dimensional so far as we can tell?
So surely the above, already known, aspect of a regular tetra could/should be
suspected of suggesting a suitable model to investigate as a basis for understanding what this 3D, electromagnetic, Realm IS...& is NOT?
Whatever...
--------------
Any motion in a double helix sees both of its strands move along/around its axis together...in the same direction. A double helix with its strands moving against each other has no sense to it...the strands would be unwinding/parting from each other.
A tetra is not only a junction, a geometric source of double helixes in 3D.
It is the means by which those helixes can all be connected yet all perform their usual strand WITH strand motion, in unison, in all three dimensions, simultaniously.
This feat is achieved by way of the motion of the junction, the tetra.
This alone, in its motion, is presenting strand AGAINST strand double helixes TO the three dimensions...facilitating the strand WITH strand double helixes in motion INTO the three dimensions.
----------------------
Take four balls & colour two in one colour, two in another....let's say red/blue as per the example above.
Glue the two reds together, likewise the two blues.
With the reds in one hand, blues in the other, bring them together as per that example, looking directly along that bimedian axis.
Now turn the reds around the blues whilst in equal measure turn the blues around the reds.....in the correct directions.
That's to say.....if you choose to push the reds backwards then pull the blues forward, or visa-versa...strand against strand.
Like everything here, it should be easy but it ain't....in fact it's impossible.
I mentioned above that strand against strand made no sense as the strands would part...but that would be both strands moving away from a centre point.
If the two strands of a double helix are acting against each other + around each other then those two strands simply move around not each other but around their shared centre point together.
The result is all four spheres, the whole tetra, looping/spiralling, at/on its centre....
In short, you can go ahead & glue the reds to the blues & still perform the above exercise just the same.there is no pairs/strands actually physically moving around each other but regardless...
`Effecting` the turning of the reds against the blues results in all four, the entire tetra, spiralling about its centre point....& that motion of the tetra, if you again changed the pairing to either of the other two pairing options available, will show as the exact same reds against blues `effected` along the other two axes/dimensions...
Those three bimedians are of course looping/spiralling around in the three dimensions along with the looping/spiralling tetra that defines them...and along each looping/spiralling bimedian there are double helixes in `normal` motion along them...enabled by way of the strand against strand double helixes in motion being presented by the tetra in motion.
I know...`Eh, come again?`
The Holy Grail is a somewhat simple/basic, uniform, 3D twist & turn motion of a tetra about its fixed centre...that presents double helixes, acting strand against strand, to the three dimensions, they themselves in the same twist & turn motion & upon each are double helixes in motion...normal strand with strand motion.
Tut...There's the simple/easiest way to get this from me to you.
I've told you so now think about it...think about it obsessively, feel a need to devote every free moment to it, become mentally fatigued in the extreme, ignore your family, friends & career far more than you should, learn to despise me for every having cursed you with a thought that you feel hopelessly compelled to pursue.
3/6 months should see the job done!
For now perhaps continue & hope, like me, that the rest might offer something more to convince you to attempt this almighty task?
----------------------
Bear witness to a tetra set in this simple motion & symbolism over ages past is revealed, its importance therein.
Sacred Geometry could be better understood to be not just a geometric blueprint for how stuff in this Realm forms, it would be seen as the dynamic blueprint for how stuff is created, grown from scratch & formed...by way of a 3D electromagnetism in motion.
Now I can't describe this motion...I can't offer you a view of it.
I have a wee advantage...a very wee advantage in that I can, with excruciating mental effort, win half decent glimpses of it. I can see it but still quite vaguely let's say.
A computer could show it of course...but I've yet to find anyone capable of telling a computer how to show it.
For now though I shall offer the following observed motion...a resultant motion stemming from the Principle Motion.
An observation most relevant to the Prince Sabu discs & the motionless four sphered tetra that we earlier left sandwiched between them.
----------------
As already stated, if a tetra were spiralling about on its centre then clearly its seven axes would also be spiralling along with it.
Any such axle would be of no practical use/advantage to us...we need a static axis/axle...as per the median axis that the two Sabu discs are on.
What is observed if one views along that median axis/axle holding the two face to face Sabu discs & the stationary tetra sandwiched between?
Well, initially we see a three sphered face in front, one sphered vertice behind....or the reverse, depending on which end of the axle it's viewed from.
What is observed as the tetra sat between the two discs now sets into its looping/spiralling motion?
Viewed from either end, if you see a three sphered face to the fore then this will `morph` into a single sphere vertice, then back to a face, then back to a vertice, then a face...a toggle between the two, over & over.
One complete loop of the tetra involves four such toggles...viewed from either end of the axle one will see two faces/two vertices to the fore, the same to the rear.
Four distinct actions to each loop in which all four faces & all four vertices of the tetra will appear on the viewed axis/axle...for this is not a simple, repetative flip of one face & one vertice.
The three morphs into one & the one morphs into the three, causing this static median axis/axle to witness a scroll through all four faces, all four vertices appearing on it.
And so, likewise the other three static median axes.
All four faces/four vertices of the spiralling tetra appear, scrolling through, on all four static median axes in one complete loop of the tetra.
This morphing occurs by way of a secondary motion occurring along all four static median axes as a result of the spiralling tetra's Principle Motion.
This secondary motion is a twisted figure of eight motion, back/forth along & around that axis/axle..
You may grasp it best as follows...
Here is a tetra of spheres coloured individually & assumed set between two Sabu discs. We view along a static median axis/axle at a face to the fore, a yellow vertice hidden behind.
Choosing clockwise then the face comprises red, then blue, then green.
The tetra now sets into its primary looped/spiralling motion on/about its centre.
The red/blue edge spirals out & away from the two `shoes` that grip them, around & across to eventually spiral into two shoes of the opposite disc behind.
The whole four sphered tetra is in motion remember....so at one & the same time the green left behind moves out of its shoe into the centre position to become a vertice...& the yellow vertice to the rear moves outward into a shoe to make way for the incoming red/blue.
Thus we now have on view a green vertice to the fore & a yellow/red/blue face to the rear.
Continuing.....the Y/R spirals across, from rear to front now, to leave a B vertice behind, a G/Y/R face to the fore.
Then G/Y across, R vertice to the fore, B/G/Y face behind.
Then B/G across from rear to front...to complete the loop back to R/B/G face to the fore, Y vertice behind....viewed similarly, scrolling through, on the other three static median axes.
Each vertice is of course moving across the diameter of both discs...through one loop of the tetra...from edge into the centre of one, out to its edge...across as part of a pair to the opposite disc's edge, in to its centre. out to its edge...across etc.
All four vertices move only as a straight line across a disc's diameter...at all other times they are one of a pair, an edge, spiralling across/around the axle.
Refering back to earlier then...
Here is a tetra split into two colours. We view it along one of its three bimedian axes....through the centre of one vertical edge (red/blue) & its horizontal opposite 2nd edge (blue/red).
It is apparent that the all red edge (3) & it's opposite all blue edge (4) are the two strands of a double helix, spiralling along/around our axis, towards & away from us the viewer.
It is apparent that the all red edge (3) & it's opposite all blue edge (4) are the two strands of a double helix, spiralling along/around our axis, towards & away from us the viewer.
This is the situation, statically, on any of the three BIMEDIANS.
That whereby inert double helixes can be constructed/projected into the three dimensions.
However, when the tetra is in its motion then as already asserted, those bimedians are also in motion with it...but this situation is `effected` along the four static MEDIANS instead...
Effected in that a single sphere vertice moves across the diameter of one disc whilst a second moves across the diameter of the other & at 90 degree to it.
Both thereby presenting the static medians with the bimedian arrangement above, but now in motion....the vertical edge presented by one sphere/vertice moving across the diameter, the horizontal edge behind by a second sphere/vertice moving across at 90 degree to it...before those two vertices each then become a part of a two sphered strand spiralling across.
And please recall...on the bimedian axes there are two double helixes in opposition...so on each of the three spiralling bimedians there is a turning helix projecting out from the `point` & another projecting into it.
Though `effected` onto four static medians the situation differs in that all four medians have four helixes moving EITHER in, all together or out all together... the four static medians have only one double helix moving in one turn/direction or the other.
Clever stuff...each sphere, in motion, becoming both vertice, part of a side & part of a face.
All from a simple tetra in a simple, uniform, 3D motion!
All hail the Holy Grail....very simple, very, very clever/innovative...the inventive step that it should/would & must be?
---------------
And finally...the Sabu discs not only hold/contain & give rise to none other than the Holy Grail itself!
I of course have no understanding as to why but it appears that there needs to be an actual movement back/forth along the static median/axle that the discs are upon in order to tap this energy...that `effecting` this , by way of a tetra spiralling upon its static centre point, doesn't lead to tapping this energy source.
If one turns a triangle centrally on a static point, a flat plate to either side, then of course its vertices will touch the plates whilst it's sides will not.
As our two discs are both entertaining both vertice & face in them then it stands to reason that a vertice must be deeper into its centre than a face is around in orde that our tetra remains turning on a static centre point...basically a bowl suit best.
But the Sabu discs are the opposite of bowls...a face around sits deeper in than a central vertice.
This creates a maximum physical shunting of the tetra's centre point back/forth along this static median axis/axle.
---------------
As protested throughout...sanity insists this be a nonsense...but...
It appears as though the Sabu disc was perhaps an essential & very unique part of some device of old that employed energy, electromagnetism, in ways unknown to us?
Known by beings more Enlightened than us?
Beings who had every just reason for deeming their geometry sacred for it gave them a tangiable God, at a point, within...creating in motion from that point...3D electromagnetism expressed via a simple, spiralling tetra, availabe to this Realm at any `point` within it.
Beings, dare I suggest, perhaps encountered by Ezekiel, with their glowing wheels that turned but not as they went, for they went on their four sides & each side was a different face...or something like that?
The Sabu disc is made from Schist...a stone & probably the best stone for the job at hand...the job, one can only imagine, of not just enabling the Holy Grail but of handling it, it being some amount of electromagnetic energy in flow.
I must beg you to consider here this simple short quote....
"Everything you think you know is merely a result of your ignorance"
Please put to one side what you think you know you know only too well....for one moment consider being as a five year old, wide-eyed & thirsty for comprehension of this very big, unfathomable, questionable experience.
____________
In conclusion.....I don't claim to be `in-touch` with anyone or anything. However, should I have seeked the Holy Grail then that would sit perfectly well in terms of the journey I've experienced...the quest. A mind quest deeply spiritual I must insist.
Throughout my 20yrs I've been nothing but patient, always somehow confident that it'll come when it's ready...when it's time is due.
We are all very divided on many an issue at this time...personally I conclude that we, the human race, are in very big trouble, bigger trouble by far than any trouble this civilization has ever experienced before.
And my five good senses are telling me that there can be no way of escaping this trouble now...bar actual Divine Intervention.
Although my reason won't allow me to believe it....maybe `now` really is
`Time ladies & gentlemen please`
Last orders....and by the Grace of God it's their round?
Thank you for your indulgence
GillSimo/Glastonbury.UK
